<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Todd Mundt &#187; Blogroll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toddmundt.com/blog/tag/blogroll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toddmundt.com/blog</link>
	<description>convergence, public media, networks, productivity, public engagement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 18:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond Broadcast Notes: What the Broadcasters are Doing</title>
		<link>http://toddmundt.com/blog/2006/05/12/beyond-broadcast-notes-what-the-broadcasters-are-doing/</link>
		<comments>http://toddmundt.com/blog/2006/05/12/beyond-broadcast-notes-what-the-broadcasters-are-doing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 14:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Mundt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[beyondbroadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pubradio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pubtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddmundt.com/blog/2006/05/12/beyond-broadcast-notes-what-the-broadcasters-are-doing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christopher Lydon, moderator; Bill Buzenberg, Minnesota Public Radio; Terry Heaton, Donata Communications; David Liroff, WGBH Bill Buzenberg spoke about Public Insight Journalism: &#8220;for every story, someone in our audience knows more than we do&#8221;, their use of &#8220;idea generators&#8221; like The Future of Small Towns. Those ideas become reports and series on-air, become comments online, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher Lydon, moderator; Bill Buzenberg, Minnesota Public Radio; Terry Heaton, Donata Communications; David Liroff, WGBH</p>
<p>Bill Buzenberg spoke about Public Insight Journalism: &#8220;for every story, someone in our audience knows more than we do&#8221;, their use of &#8220;idea generators&#8221; like <a href="http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/projects/2005/04/smalltowns/">The Future of Small Towns</a>. Those ideas become reports and series on-air, become comments online, become townhall meetings and symposia, and eventually generates more content. American Public Media has created <a href="http://access.minnesota.publicradio.org/press_releases/releases/20060426_cij.php">the Center for Innovation in Journalism</a> to offer Public Insight Journalism to public broadcasters around the country.</p>
<p>Terry Heaton said disruption is an opportunity for growth.</p>
<ul>
<li>Media is unbundled at the point of origin and rebundled at the point of consumption. (media is embracing the first part of this, but not the second.)</li>
<li>Mediated people make their own media.</li>
</ul>
<p>David Liroff spoke about WGBH&#8217;s new media and interactive efforts. &#8220;This is less about technology and more about engagement.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toddmundt.com/blog/2006/05/12/beyond-broadcast-notes-what-the-broadcasters-are-doing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Power of Re-bundling</title>
		<link>http://toddmundt.com/blog/2006/04/13/the-power-of-re-bundling/</link>
		<comments>http://toddmundt.com/blog/2006/04/13/the-power-of-re-bundling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Mundt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[attention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pubradio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pubtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddmundt.com/blog/2006/04/13/the-power-of-re-bundling/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the reasons I started this weblog after years of wondering whether I should bother with one or not was because I hoped that I could write something from time to time that people would read and find interesting. The second reason why I started this weblog was that I want it to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the reasons I started this weblog after years of wondering whether I should bother with one or not was because I hoped that I could write something from time to time that people would read and find interesting. The second reason why I started this weblog was that I want it to be my personal content management system for things that are important to me &#8211; like my del.icio.us bookmarks, a collection of valuable assets &#8211; either created by me or aggregated by me.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a piece I want to keep &#8211; <a href="http://edgeperspectives.typepad.com/edge_perspectives/2006/04/abc_and_the_fut.html">ABC and the Future of Media by John Hagel.</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to summarize it here. You should read the whole thing.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; rebundling of media will be where the bulk of value capture occurs in the media business. It will certainly be the key to <a href="http://edgeperspectives.typepad.com/edge_perspectives/2005/12/unbundling_time.html">building scalable and sustainable media businesses</a>.</p>
<p>That is one of the consequences of the growing relative scarcity of attention – anyone who can help audiences connect with the most relevant and engaging content will be richly rewarded.</p>
<p>Branding in the traditional media business still remains largely with the talent rather than the intermediary.  Few people go to a movie because of the studio that produced it, watch a TV show because of the network that broadcast it, buy a CD because of the music company that produced it or read a book because of the publisher that issued it. Magazines and radio are partial exceptions that prove the rule – it is not accidental that these are the two traditional media businesses with the most “micro-chunked” content.</p>
<p>As content proliferates, this is going to change profoundly.  The most powerful brands in the media business will be held by successful intermediaries that help to consistently improve <a href="http://edgeperspectives.typepad.com/edge_perspectives/2005/11/return_on_atten.html">return on attention</a> for audiences. In the process, the <a href="http://www.johnhagel.com/view20050612.shtml">nature of the brand promise will change in a profound way</a>.  It will be a massive opportunity for media companies that understand the shift in economic and competitive dynamics and that focus on the rebundling plays required to build these brands.</p>
<p>There’s another way to frame the strategic opportunity/challenge for media businesses going forward.  In addition to unbundling and rebundling of content, media companies face a choice: do they want to remain product businesses or do they want to become audience relationship businesses?</p>
<p>Here’s the test:  how open is the media company to providing access to third party content on behalf of their audiences?  If the answer is not very open, the company is primarily a product business.  If the answer is very open, then the company is primarily an audience relationship business.</p>
<p>Audience relationship businesses take&#8230; proliferating content options as an opportunity, rather than a challenge.  The more options there are, the more value that can be created by organizing, packaging, presenting and adding to these options for specific audiences. It’s a completely different mindset, skill set, culture and economics.  Media companies that want to make the transition from a product business to an audience relationship business don’t have to do this overnight.  There is a pragmatic migration path that evolves from product mindsets to platform mindsets and then eventually leads to a full blown audience relationship mindset.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think the power of this piece is Hagel&#8217;s understanding that the greatest potential lies in rebundling content, a good portion of which may not be your own, to build a strong relationship with your audience. This reminds me of Terry Heaton&#8217;s belief that media companies need to come up with entirely new business models online. Many of his ideas are totally unrelated to the content those companies currently offer &#8211; but the content is tied to the needs of your audience &#8211; those who already engage with you in your mainline business and those who have no previous experience with your mainline business but will develop a relationship with you based on your new models.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to be accused of oversimplifying, but this strikes me as a powerful argument for the role of trusted aggregator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toddmundt.com/blog/2006/04/13/the-power-of-re-bundling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commuters listen less, talk more</title>
		<link>http://toddmundt.com/blog/2006/03/08/commuters-listen-less-talk-more/</link>
		<comments>http://toddmundt.com/blog/2006/03/08/commuters-listen-less-talk-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Mundt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://p7.hostingprod.com/@toddmundt.com/blog/2006/03/08/commuters-listen-less-talk-more/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times reports a new study by Bridge Ratings showing commuters are spending less time listening to the radio and more time talking on their cellphones. Apparently, we make longer phones while we&#8217;re in our cars than while we&#8217;re out of them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/06/technology/06drill.html?ei=5090&#038;en=c80594fec3dc3ea6&#038;ex=1299301200&#038;adxnnl=1&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss&#038;adxnnlx=1141711460-c6x0sYo49zebQX824Jw6Cw">The New York Times reports</a> a new study by Bridge Ratings showing commuters are spending less time listening to the radio and more time talking on their cellphones. Apparently, we make longer phones while we&#8217;re in our cars than while we&#8217;re out of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toddmundt.com/blog/2006/03/08/commuters-listen-less-talk-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
